Earthshock
People often complain about the contrivances and plot holes in Earthshock, and first off Ill acknowledge that theyre there. The suggestion that the Cybermens computer can be code-cracked to make another vehicle travel in time is particularly bothersome, and Im always troubled by the implication that the Doctors (and Adrics) interference caused the extinction of the dinosaurs and set Earths history on a radically different evolutionary track. Im reassured by fans that this is not actually a paradox, but it still seems to me to create a circular timeline (Adric crashes freighter, which causes Earth to evolve differently, which [presumably] causes the Doctor to become fond of it, which causes the Doctor to become involved in Cyberman gambit in the first place, which causes the freighter to travel in time and crash in the first place, etc.) that, if not technically impossible or rule-breaking, is still more annoying than clever. In my view, anyway.
But I wont say anything more about that, and truly, its not the plot holes that bother me so much about this story. Generally speaking, Im much happier with a Doctor Who plot that *seems* to make sense when it doesnt, as opposed to one that works the other way round, and Earthshocks storyline is definitely the former. But even with a tolerant attitude towards sloppy plotting, Earthshock isnt really all that good. Eric Sawards writing is a big part of the problem here his unrelenting badass dialogue wants desperately to be serious and adult, but instead comes off as just macho and dull and comic-book-ish. Sawards story is obviously influenced by Alien, but in its scripting it actually more anticipates James Camerons (much-overrated, in my view) sequel Aliens like that film, Earthshock is also dominated by mock-American war-movie clichés, and theyre not even well fleshed out or entertaining ones at that. It doesnt help that the supporting cast is uniformly uncharismatic, with the obvious exception of Beryl Reid, who makes a surprisingly sporting attempt, despite being impossibly miscast. (Its not really a successful attempt, but its appreciated for its sheer oddity, if nothing else.) And of course theres David Bankss booming portrayal of the Cyber Leader how funny that this character turns out to be one of the scripts most human characters!
But even all this might not be such a problem, if Sawards tough-as-nails style didnt also extend to his characterization of the Doctor, both in terms of dialogue and concept. To be fair, Peter Davison, bless his heart, acts himself into a frenzy here scowling, snickering, squeaking, and displaying all the little tics that make his Doctor unique but it still cant save a writing approach that seems so false to the character. For instance, when Adric asks the Doctor how much damage will be inflicted by the bomb, and he responds Enough to make life intolerable for the few who survived, its an odd moment: this is evidently Sawards stab at Doctorish wit, but it almost makes the Doctor sound impressed, as if hes bragging about the weapons capacity for destruction. Similarly, when he casually describes the victims not as dead but rather finished, he sounds more like a war-hardened general than an appalled humanist. And the sight of the Fifth Doctor pressing a gun into someones chest, even a Cybermans, and repeatedly firing, is extremely unpleasant, and justly criticized by some critics of this story. There really is no other way to put it, except to say that, at moments like these, one really does feel that the series is going horribly wrong.
Thats not to say that everything is bad here. Peter Grimwades direction is actually very good throughout, with the android scenes in Episode One being especially well handled when those dark shapes approach from the shadows, we cant be sure if theyre friendly troopers or something else, and its genuinely scary. Later on, things become more routine, but its all still well done enough, and there are occasional nice touches throughout (e.g. when the Cybermens shadows appear around the corner before they do). Matthew Waterhouse is a controversial figure, of course, but personally I dont find his acting all that bad I actually think a lot of fans project their dislike of Adrics *character* onto the performer, and thats never entirely fair. At any rate, I find him pretty convincing here, with his final moment as he breathes heavily while gripping the belt suitably underplayed. (What would people rather he did, start screaming for help, or banging wildly on the controls?) Tegan and Nyssa arent given much to do, but thats appropriate enough given the story is Adrics swan song, and at least Tegan provides the inspiration for that fine exchange between the Doctor and the Cyber Leader its one of the few points in this story where the Doctor really seems like himself.
And I suppose I must also mention that world events since this story have added a truly frightening resonance to the terrorist tactics attempted by the Cybermen here, and this fact, while accidental, undeniably contributes to the overall effect of Earthshock. Unfortunately, its not enough to save the story.