Underworld

How many fans can claim the expectant pleasure of sitting down and watching a Tom Baker story that they had never seen before and better still, knew very little about? Oooh, how many times I have sat and watched Who, wishing to supernatural entities, that somehow, at the age of 29, no matter how infeasible, I could forget that I had watched a favourite story 50 times before, and experience its excitement afresh?

Well, now I can, and crumbs it was almost like a saturday teatime. The story in question was fan "not-favourite", Underworld. How I came to have not seen it before, is (rather like Underworlds repute) a dull story, consisting of UKGold video mishaps, late teen "I'm too old for it now.." pretentions, and general apathy to a story that everyone says is a steaming pile of cakka....

Revisionism is all the rage in fandom right now, not surprising, given that all of us are at a stage where we have endlessly raked over a finite number of stories an infinite number of times and lets face it, what we thought was cool at 10, looks like Resurrection now. On the face of it, Underworld has committed more heinous sins than most of the loathed stories over the years, the at a glance loathometer sites the following reasons to loathe: 

1. It was done on the cheap with 80% of sets being CSO travesties.

2. It appeared in Graham Williams "Silly" era

3. Tom Baker is as mad as a fish in it.

4. The story's poop.

Now, I hate to succum to the revisionist fever, so I won't, because I've never seen Underworld before. But, I will say this, I thoroughly enjoyed every second of this wretched adventure!!

Firstly, lets address the number one gripe, the CSO. I find it very odd that this is the oft sited reason for this stories alleged Turkeydom, surely crap budgets are part and parcel of what Doctor Who is? "Its about the scripts!" was the oft quoted defense on the school playground when someone laughed at cybermen with cricket gloves...(and boy, didn't it put that bully in his place..) but we digress...let me tell you something, the CSO's not as bad as you've been told, at no stage did it detract from the believability of the programme, at no stage did anyones foot disappear (as I've often heard said) and by and large, considering what it is, its done amazingly well. The perspective is always correct, people walk accurately behind things and Tom Bakers hair is never ablaze with electronic fuzz like ole Perter's is in the Green Death mine shaft...

Funnily enough, considering the story is awash with what must have been a nightmare workload for the VidFX folk, the rest of the video effects and model work are very, very good by Who standards. The opening Nebula is tremendously effective (100 times more so than the mandragora helix just a couple of years previously) and all the ray gun zaps are also well done. I think we know where the budget from the sets went....

Okay, point 2 and 3. I like Tom Baker being a crazy assed mofo and I like Who being silly, and whats more, so does my girlfriend who easily bores of Who without Tom's arrogantly witty put downs. Whats good for her, is good for me.

Point 4. Bob Baker and Dave Martin get a lot of very unfair stick. I have to say I think these two have come up with some of the best, most imaginative stories of all time and they always write excellent dialogue for the Doc. Concepts seem to be their strong point, but not at the expense of plot or story. As most folk probably know, there are vague allusions to Jason and the Argonauts through out, it doesn't really add anything, but its an additional layer to muse over. OK, so I was left wondering if the guards were robots or simply wearing radiation suits, but as long as you don't scratch too deep...The concept of the Timelords being gods to the minyans and effectively ruining them in the process is excellent. We all imagine that this sort of Galifreyan interventionist/imperialist bashing only happens later in TOTL and such, but here it is, much more subtly and understated. I'll grant you, the idea of a computer gone megalomaniac is not the worlds most original premise, but look at the other concepts; a spaceship that has a planet formed around it, legends being the portents of things to come..etc. Even the design ideas are spot on, the radiation suits and robots look wonderfully old fashioned and the shield guns, whilst clearly made of lightweight plastic, are far more interesting than the usual bog standard generic space laser we are treated to.

At the end of the day, without looking too closely and doing anything silly like drawing a comparison with Talons of Weng Chiang, I found Underworld to be hugely enjoyable romp with excellent ideas and some smart direction. Tom always makes these stories for me and its easy to forget that really, Tom IS the show, just like he thought he was. I cant imagine any of the later Doctors carrying this story so well. He always elevates it above the bog standard. On any other day of the week, this would be a 3 stars or less, but for pure enjoyment, (and surely thats what its all about?) I'm gonna give it 4. The TV viewing public agreed with me, ratings at this stage of the shows history were high and any future producers of the show would do well to remember that and do their damndest to ignore the fanboys....