пїЅAs one of the few surviving intact examples,пїЅ Paul Clarke says, above, пїЅпїЅThe AztecsпїЅ is a fine instance of the DOCTOR WHO historical stories.пїЅ In other words, like it merely because it didnпїЅt get wiped. Now, clearly, thatпїЅs not what Mr. Clarke (and seemingly everyone who writes about this serial) actually intends to say, but пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ largely escapes serious examination simply because it survives, not because itпїЅs actually all that good.
Unlike most other DOCTOR WHO stories, пїЅAztecsпїЅ makes the changing of EarthпїЅs known history its primary thematic and plot device. With a few notable exceptions, DOCTOR WHO avoids discussion of the issue altogether. пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ gives us hints as to why that is. Few stories, and certainly fewer still that actually survive, deal so simply and directly with the issue of the TARDIS crew changing a part of EarthпїЅs known past. Here it is plot, theme, character motivation, denouement, and even back-jacket tagline: пїЅYou canпїЅt change history, Barbara. Not one line!пїЅ The story, at its most basic level, is about BarbaraпїЅs defiance of this stern edict.
And itпїЅs hard to imagine a worse mistake that a writer could make with DOCTOR WHO. Except of course that writer John Lucarotti DOES make it worse. He puts the wrong characters on the wrong sides of the argumentпїЅand then promptly has them пїЅforgetпїЅ their own arguments. In short, пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ is an incoherent swampland of mischaracterization, hoping that the audience wonпїЅt notice the flaws with the script amidst the generally strong acting and production design.
Once a writer makes the implications of time travel the central theme of a DOCTOR WHO story, heпїЅs on very shaky groundпїЅespecially if he chooses to make the Doctor the advocate for non-intervention. Lucarotti makes his job even harder by choosing to set this argument against the backdrop of known Earth history. Do what you want to the history of Skaro, or even the events of the present day upon the future of the Earth, but stories about EarthпїЅs actual history require much greater care than Lucarotti was apparently able to give.
There is, after all, very little established at the beginning of episode one that isnпїЅt contradicted by the end of it. The other three episodes are just there to let Lucarotti get himself into deeper trouble. When the TARDIS crew first arrives, the Doctor doesnпїЅt care at all about tampering with the timeline. Instead, he gleefully helps set up Barbara as a god and all but encourages Ian to contest for the leadership of the military. While Barbara is screwing with the timeline to the benefit of the TARDIS crew, the Doctor chuckles a lot and finds it all, to use his word, пїЅcharmingпїЅ. Within a few short minutes, though, this Doctor regenerates into a Time Lord more akin to Borusa than himself. When Barbara tries to intervene with the local customs and stop a ritual killing, the Doctor goes Gallifreyan on her, giving her a standard пїЅnon-interventionistпїЅ line. Then, he ignores what heпїЅs just said, nipping off to the Garden of Peace for a little bit of local strumpet. Meanwhile, Susan and Ian both make similar incursions into local customs and the Doctor, apparently spent from his argument with Barbara, shows no concern over their polluting the time stream. Problematically, the only member of the TARDIS crew to whom the non-interventionist theme of the story applies to is Barbara--and, of course, only after sheпїЅs set up as a god.
And thereпїЅs really no damn good reason for the inconsistencies. What did the Doctor expect was going to happen when he encouraged his crew assumed positions of high power in fifteenth-century Mexico? Surely he had to anticipate that his crew might use their newfound positions of power to affect change. If he did, then the DoctorпїЅs just a selfish bastard, more concerned with getting back to the TARDIS than the potential damage to the time stream. If he didnпїЅt, heпїЅs just a damned fool. For the love of God, Lucarotti: Ian and Barbara are high school teachers from the 60s. Idealists like this are exactly the wrong humans to install as leaders of Aztec Mexico if youпїЅre trying to avoid intervention. Regardless of his companionsпїЅ пїЅfitness to commandпїЅ, the Doctor got Barbara into this mess. HeпїЅs got no business yelling at her for, well, being herself.
Worse, Lucarotti takes the DoctorпїЅs hypocrisy inexplicably further. What, after all, does the Doctor do almost immediately after his blow-out with Barbara? He goes to sample the local cuisine, falling in love with Cameca. Now, had this been used as part of the motivation behind the DoctorпїЅs generally romance-less TARDIS, it wouldпїЅve been cool. Very cool. The Doctor falls in love with a human from the fifteenth century, realizes the error of his ways, then takes a memento of her with him, foreswearing love with humans forever more. Instead, itпїЅs just a rather stock пїЅships that pass in the nightпїЅ kinda thing that exposes the DoctorпїЅs anger in episode one as a lie. Taken with the other logical inconsistencies, the storyпїЅs theme is reduced to a legalistic punch line: пїЅYou canпїЅt change history, Barbara. Not one line. Unless helping set you up as a God will get us back to the TARDIS. Or if I get a little action in the Garden of Peace. Or if my granddaughter is forced to marry someone she doesnпїЅt want to. Or if IanпїЅs sense of macho isnпїЅt offended. Or if you only affect the destiny of one or two locals (and you can assure me that those one or two locals donпїЅt go on to lead a revolutionary movement). Oh, the hell with it, woman. You fly in my TARDIS. Just obey me and bring me tea when I ask for it.пїЅ
Still, having said all this, Lucarotti couldпїЅve gotten away with it all. He could have, indeed, written one of the very best stories DOCTOR WHO had ever televised. If he had merely taken his situation, and his thesis, and written the parts appropriate to character. The thought that struck me on my very first viewing of this story was that Barbara and the Doctor were playing the wrong parts. Strictly from a character standpoint, the Doctor should have been Yetaxa. Then he would have been the one to make the timestream-altering decisionsпїЅa far more palatable position for the Doctor to be in. Imagine пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ if the Doctor were himself, crusading against injustice, while Barbara, the history teacher, works out the implications to her time line if the Doctor carries on. The tension in the story thus becomes the alien of пїЅUnearthly ChildпїЅ doing what he thinks is best versus the human who cares about saving her own timeline. The tension would have been infinitely more effective if the history teacher had been using one of her character traits to fight for something that directly affected her, rather than the more esoteric position she finds herself defending. And imagine the fun of her upbraiding the Doctor for falling in love with the local! Instead of a quickly-mumbled line giving playful assent to the DoctorпїЅs romance with Cameca (one that, incidentally, never has Barbara even vaguely taking the Doctor to task for being such an obvious hypocrite) we could have had a wonderful subplot with Barbara upbraiding the Doctor for messing not only with EarthпїЅs timestream but the affections of a woman he knew full well there could be no future with. Were Barbara herself and the Doctor actually a renegade Time Lord, the line that might have been extracted for the back cover wouldnпїЅt have been the mundane, пїЅYou canпїЅt change history,пїЅ but the infinitely more intriguing, пїЅYou canпїЅt fall in love, Doctor. Ian and I might never be born!пїЅ
As televised, though, its many scripted flaws make пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ more an пїЅimportantпїЅ work than a good one. Should you watch it? Of course. But then, youпїЅre a DOCTOR WHO fan trying to understand the history of the series. Most casual viewers today, to the extent that they would watch a black-and-white program at all, would probably switch it off after episode one. And thatпїЅs really the source of most of the enjoyment this serial offers. пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ is important for the DOCTOR WHO fan to watch because it shows perfectly why this type of DOCTOR WHO faded. Careful observers might even see, by virtue of the storyпїЅs negative example, how the form might be revived to better effect in future. I suppose, too, пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ provides a useful jumping-off point for broader discussions about the DoctorпїЅs use of time travel throughout his several regenerations and format changes. ItпїЅs just a shame that the one thing пїЅThe AztecsпїЅ fails to do is provide a consistent approach to the subject within its own four episodes. Had it at least done thisпїЅregardless of what other producers did with the subject later onпїЅit might be entirely a classic today.