The Empty Child

Sunday, 22 May 2005 - Reviewed by Mark Francome

Holy Moly! I was out on Saturday (we went to see a film about a man who got his face changed into a gas mask, "Revenge of the Slith" or something like that) hence I have only just watched the tape. I'm sure it wasn't planned this way, but the earlier start time can only have created a mini-generation of toddlers who will forever be traumatised by even the briefest glimpse of a gas mask. Having taped the BBC3 repeat I then got to see RTD in "Confidential", waving his arms and stating that the over-arching theme for this story would be "romance". Romance? If your idea of romance is meeting your loved one at 1 a.m. in a foggy graveyard and then moving onto an abandoned morgue for some "action" then, yes, this was romantic. RTD wasn't joking when he said that this episode was pushing the limit as to what could be shown to children. A colleague of mine is having to deal with his distressed 5 year-old who hasn't slept a full night since Saturday. He's weighing up whether to let the child view part 2, it might 'cure' him to see the resolution and reassure him that "everything turns out right in the end ...". It doesn't help that the child's mother is away at the moment ... "Mummy ... Mummy ... where is my Mummy?"

Anyway, to the actual story. I'm sure somebody will contradict me, but I cannot recall anything to equal the pure "creepiness" of the horror portrayed here. Sure, the Dalek tentacle from under the Thal cape, the Yetis wandering through London (ditto Cybermen), Autons crashing through shop windows (the first time around) and Sea Devils striding from the ocean; these are all classic images that had the power to terrify. But those were terrifying on a gentler scale, somehow offset by the fantastic elements involved. Here "The Empty Child" gives us an image that will rank "gas mask and shoulders" above those that have gone before ... I speak of the child reaching through the letter box. We don't even get to see the mutated head, just a silhouette through the frosted glass in the door ... the grasping hand, the plaintive cry ... "I'm looking for my Mummy". These unsettling elements are topped off by the simple "unknown threat" that is personified by an anonymous small boy in short trousers.

The writer, Steven Moffat, has added so many themes and references to the В“Midwich CuckoosВ”/В”Invasion of the Body SnatchersВ” threads that you hardly know which way to turn. We have the kids from В“Oliver TwistВ” looking out for themselves (and each other), the spooky abandoned hospital (a horror film stalwart, right up to В“28 Days LaterВ”), the gas masks (1980s pop video short-hand for В“we are all faceless zombiesВ”), the monkey toy that repeated the В“whereВ’s my MummyВ” line (a la В“Close EncountersВ”) В… all of these elements are mixed brilliantly (brilliant in a dark way, that is) and they only felt like clichГ© when the undead moved in on the Doctor, Rose and the Captain for the cliff-hanger (and cliff-hangers are always clichГ©d, so even thatВ’s ok). And I could even overlook the smarmy Captain Jack and his leery brand of romance (although it was good line about living his ship tethered to Big Ben).

I hope part 2 doesnВ’t go in for any easy explanations and that the story manages to grip in the unprecedented manner of part 1 (i.e. gripping by the throat). And hopefully the writing team as a whole havenВ’t blown too many good ideas in this series; I can imagine that they thought there was a strong chance that the whole enterprise (no Spock pun intended) was only going to get one series and hence have decided to hit us with both barrels while they can. Happily, Doctor Who returning for only the one season seems like an absurd idea (a bit like George Lucas leaving things at just the one В“Star WarsВ” film).

I can only close by quoting those young sages on the Fear Factor page (at the BBC site); В“As the episode ends, Samuel asks his mum: "Can we watch the next episode in the daytime? When it's light? Adam has been taking lessons from his grandma about avoiding nightmares: "This is so scary - people shouldn't eat cheese before watching it."





FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television

The Empty Child

Sunday, 22 May 2005 - Reviewed by Andy Griffiths

A mysterious bomb-like object no one is allowed to approach; an eerie child clad in a gas mask calling out for mummy; German air raids; a dashing confidence trickster with his own spaceship tethered to Big Ben. As with last week, "The Empty Child" found our heroes once more back in London, but that was where all similarity ended.

I was half-preparing myself for a repeat of "The Long Game/Dalek" factor, i.e. a mediocre follow-up to a series classic. However, "The Empty Child", whilst a very different beast to the scintillating "Father's Day", is nevertheless fine, absorbing Who, and certainly the most frightening of the new series so far, if a little uneven occasionally.

First, the good points. The recreation of Blitz-era London was quite wonderful, and shots of Heinkel 111 bombers were spectacular, not something the old series had the tools to recreate. As in "The Unquiet Dead", the BBC gets a chance to flex its period drama muscles, and the results are excellent.

Ecclestone continues to impress, here showing compassion for the 'little people' once again in his interactions with the homeless children, and getting one or two neat comic lines such as the "has anything fallen from the sky?" line in the nightclub. Apart from the odd blip, such as "Aliens of London" and "The Long Game", he has been compelling to watch and as the series' conclusion draws nearer this viewer is coming to regret his departure more and more. Here he is also a bit more proactive than before, which can only be a good thing.

I must confess I was dreading the introduction of Captain Jack, but he was surprising engaging, and I loved his description of the Doctor and Rose as "flag girl" and "U-boat captain". The supporting characters were also well presented in the form of the haunted Nancy and the dying Dr Constantine, caring for the victims of the mystery plague alone in a darkened, quarantined old hospital. Was it me or was this the same hospital used in "Aliens of London"?

True horror returned to Doctor Who this week; my partner had to watch something else light afterwards as she was quite disturbed by the child, from its first appearance as a silhouette calling out "Are you my mummy?" Hopefully this will not be over-used next week however as it could grow irritating.

I had high hopes for the script, penned as it is by Steven Moffat, writer of the excellent Coupling. For the most part it delivers, although this viewer did wince when the tired old "Doctor Who?" gag was wheeled out. Overall however Moffat did continue the trend of the best scripts being produced by writers other than RTD.

Gripes? Only a minor one, but I was a little disappointed with Billie Piper this week, mainly as I found her schoolgirl-like crush and responses to Captain Jack a bit out of character; although the scenes are well-written in comic fashion, it did seem to clash a little with the overall feel of the episode, which was very much the darkest and most traditionally horrific of the new series so far in my book. And I'm still unsure about Captain Jack as a recurring character, although this could produce some good needle between him and Ecclestone, and perhaps better Harkness than Adam or Mickey. Meanwhile I found the incidental music rather anonymous after Murray Gold's marvellous contribution to "Father's Day". On the other hand, anonymous is better than intrusive.

Good to have a proper cliffhanger, and well done to the BBC for learning from the mistake of "Aliens of London" by giving a spoiler warning before showing the preview of next week's episode. Bet most of us watched the preview anyway though, eh?

Overall, a fine and chilling episode, with plenty of horror and enough unanswered questions to make next week must-see TV. And, for all my misgivings about two or three of the episodes hitherto screened, Doctor Who 2005 has remained compelling watching, and who could ask for more than that?





FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television

Father's Day

Sunday, 15 May 2005 - Reviewed by Steve Manfred
The hardest part about reviewing "Father's Day" is knowing where to start. Normally, episodes of "Doctor Who" have something about them that didn't quite work and act as a sort of hand-hold to start a review from, not so much to complain about the thing that was wrong as to provide better contrast with the things that were right. With "Father's Day," everything seemed right to me... and so I'm unsure where to begin!

I'll begin at the beginning then, with where this all started, which was Paul Cornell's excellent, excellent script. This felt like he took only the best things about the NAs and the Charley arc in the Big Finish audios and rolled them into the consummate human interest time travel s.f. drama, with some good old-fashioned TV narrative flashback tricks thrown in for good measure (by this I mean the bits of narration from Rose on the picture of her dad, or Jackie telling little Rose all about him). The neat thing is that I knew this was coming... that something telling something very like this story in this style and manner was on its way from Paul... and still I found it extremely moving and touching and sad and life-affirming all at the same time (and alternative times ). The only explanation for my reaction that I can think of is that the story itself, so basic, so pure, and so right, is too strong for my cynicism. Of course Rose would want to see her dead father before he died. Of course she'd want to stop that death from happening. So of course she goes to that time and place and tries to stop it, though she hasn't quite admitted to herself or to the Doctor yet that that's why she's there. And of course she can't quite bring herself to do it the first time around... it seems too unreal even now she's been in the TARDIS for more than half a season. And so of course she tries again and does save him. And of course, disaster ensues, and the only way to put it right is for Peter to let that car hit him after all. This is "Doctor Who" being truly honest and complete with human emotions in relation to the possibilities that a time machine affords people in a way the original TV series rarely was, and that's why this new season so totally rules.

The way we get there is entertaining in itself too, with all sorts of Paul Cornell trademark dialog flourishes. He was writing Joss Whedon dialog before Joss Whedon was, and Rose's little "don't go there... you don't know where there is... and you're so very far away from there... etc" speech was the best example of this when Jack's starting to compliment her on her looks. The "don't touch the baby" scene was also very good. I also love the little details of the people other than her beloved dad that she meets while she's trying to cope with him, like Jackie (and her 80s hair) and most especially the child version of Mickey. He was so cute!

I also love the way Peter was portrayed. He came across to me as a man who's a "loser" mainly because of where society has put him and because Jackie defines him that way. He's actually very capable of thinking very creatively and imaginatively for himself and doing the right thing as he ably proves at the end when he lets the car run him over as it should have, having largely worked out the whole time puzzle for himself. And this makes perfect sense for his character, because these are the same traits inherent in Rose herself and aren't there in Jackie, so she must have got them from him. When he tells Rose that he wouldn't have been the best father in the world like she thought he would've been, I don't really believe him. He would've been an ordinary one who made mistakes, sure, but his love for Rose was pure, and that's what would've made him the "perfect" father. In fact, nevermind the "would've." He was already.

And then there's the Doctor. And I didn't really believe him either when he flew off the handle and called Rose a stupid ape and threatened to leave her there. And neither did Rose, so again she's proving she's got him pegged. And he didn't really believe himself either... he's not honest with himself until that moment in the church where he tells Rose that he wasn't really going to leave her. The open question is why he did this in the first place... took her to see this day, and I don't really swallow the idea that "oh, he's alien, he didn't guess that she'd do this" that some have suggested. I think part of him knew she'd do it and maybe wanted to see just what would happen... if the Reapers really would come and start cauterizing the planet or if they could maybe somehow get away with doing this like he'd done in the old days when the Time Lords were still around. He tells Rose himself that he'd thought of doing this very same thing to save his own people and family but hadn't for fear of this happening. Was Rose's situation some sort of guinea pig experiment for him, just to make sure the Reapers really would turn up? I think he's letting himself think he's being high and mighty and Time Lordish about the interference in time just to give his emotions an excuse not to try this for himself. Now, of course, he's got his proof, and I wouldn't expect him to really give it a go. But I think a piece of him wondered... and _that's_ the alien part of him... not ignorance of emotion, but rather the more selfish, darker emotion he's had ever since he picked up that rock to bash in Za's skull in "The Forest of Fear." I keep saying he's damaged, and his actions here, especially when he gives himself up to the invading Reaper in the church, prove the idea that he's got a death wish.

Ah yes, the Reapers... I think they're the best-looking monsters the series has given us since.... um.... gosh I've got to go quite a way back here.... er, the Zygons? There we go. I mean, wow... they looked amazing, cool, and very photo-realistic. They were flawless in design and execution and very scary to watch in action. They're certainly the fastest monsters we've ever had in "Doctor Who" (though that's not saying much). In conception, well, they're Vortisaurs by another not-previously-owned name really, serving much the same time-eating function as they and other time-eating creatures we've heard of before, and they can get into time from the vortex thanks to the weaknesses that Peter's living has created (in the same way that the never-people in "Neverland" were able to do through Charley in the second McGann audio season). I've seen some ask "why didn't they go for Peter then... he was the paradox," to which I would answer, "duh... he's their way in... kill him and the buffet table is closed." I adore these things, and I wouldn't mind seeing them again someday... especially if one turns out to be named Ramsay. (hang on... they're never actually called Reapers in the dialog... maybe they really are vortisaurs after all... hehe)

And what of the time paradox? And the Blinovitch Limitation Effect? And so on? Did the temporal science fiction all work? Well, yes, it did. It's easier to work it all out after a second viewing, but even on a first nothing felt wrong to me. The only possible "cheat" in it all was the hit-and-run car reappearing so that Pete could go get himself run over by it, but even that has a sort of symmetry to it... Pete and that driver's fates were intertwined, and it makes sense to me that Pete's going on into the future when he shouldn't have might have caused the car and driver to sort of get stuck when they were in time... and always in Pete's vicinity. As for the connecting of all the causality dots, I'm not going to do that here... suffice to say I thought about it all, and everything seems kosher to me. I will say that I did like that the BLE "don't touch youself" paradox from "Mawdryn Undead" was acknowledged here (if not named), though the effect was slightly different. Paul sort of glossed over this back in his audio "Seasons of Fear," and I was afraid he might do the same here... afraid because I really like the idea and think it makes more sense than nothing happening at all when people meet themselves.

The direction was faultless again... and for a story set largely in a church-under-siege, Joe Ahearne managed to keep it very visually dynamic... a Reaper-POV shot here... a cool lighting effect on Rose there... and the location shooting helped open things up a great deal too after the claustrophobic feel of the last two episodes. It looked really nice, and I loved all the little attention to 80s detail such as Rick Astley on the radio and the hairstyles and the giant-sized cell phone, etc. Great stuff.

I even have good things to say about Murray Gold's incidental music for once. Well, almost... he didn't really get anything wrong this week I thought, and some of it was quite good. I can still think of some others who could do better, but this was easily his best "Who" score to date, and it did not detract or distract me from the story for once.

One final thought on the season story arc... that of the damaged Doctor who seems to have a bit of a death wish and this "Bad Wolf" that keeps following him around and leaving its name everywhere he goes. I know it won't turn out this way, but this really does have the trademarks of Fenric about it, doesn't it? And never moreso than _this_ week, where we visit _1987_ and some massive time storms get whipped up... sound familiar? This is just when Ace was before Fenric took her to Iceworld. If it wasn't so fanwanky, I'd think that Fenric survived "The Curse of Fenric" after all and maybe was the thing that arranged the Time War and this time beat the Doctor. It's more likely these are Fenric red herrings designed to get fans like me thinking the wrong way when it'll be something completely new we've never heard of before. It's fun to speculate, whatever it is though.

10 out of 10 for "Father's Day." If anything gets any better than this, it'll have deserved to have broken the scale.

Addendum: - It just occurred to me that I wrote that whole review without praising Billie Piper and Christopher Eccleston on their performances (especially Billie). I just talked about Rose and the Doctor as though they were real people... and that's how good Piper and Eccleston were and are... they weren't there at all. They got out of the way and let the Doctor and Rose go through it all completely and honestly, and the only way you'll know it was acting is when you see the artists on an award show picking up their well-deserved statues or whatever it is you get for a BAFTA. They were so good I forgot they had to work at this. Sorry!




FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television

Father's Day

Sunday, 15 May 2005 - Reviewed by A.D. Morrison
And so the familiar patterns re-asserts itself after the rather rushed and lightweight The Long Game (which, however, was certainly RTD's best so far in my opinion): once again RTD's Doctor Who writing is called into question as his latest offering was sandwiched between two brilliant episodes by other writers, Dalek by Rob Shearman (the best episode so far) and Father's Day by Paul Cornell (quite possibly the second best so far, in joint place with Unquiet Dead (what a coincidence, another writer) by Mark Gatiss, or possibly an all out second place, reviewing will help me decide this).
The key improvement here from The Long Game was in the writing for the Doctor and Eccleston's related interpretation of the character: here we have the Doctor almost exactly as he should be, fairly cerebral, quite remote, a slightly understated, shadowy figure of mystery mingled with reassuring humanity, and gravitas of presence. All these qualities almost lacked completely from The Long Game's version of the Doctor, who was frankly just irritating. The character is, after all, a Doctor, which means his chief function is to heal and mend, and I'm reminded of the one good line in the otherwise shambolic Meglos in which a character alldues to him as a strange traveller who takes up the broken threads of time and puts them together again, or something along those lines. And in Father's Day (shame about the bathetic title) the Doctor is given the prime opportunity to act as a custodian of time intervention and most refreshingly, to act literally as a time doctor and mend time's broken fabric, incurred by Rose saving her father's life. This plot scenario, together with admirably subtle and fairly haunting direction in parts, created a welcome echo of that superbly mysterious and atmospheric series of the early 80s, Sapphire and Steel, and here we have a Doctor pretty much fulfilling both those characters functions in one persona, which is pretty much how I think the Doctor should be: an investigator and mender of time disturbances. In particular, the continual shot of the car appearing and reappearing in a time loop outside the church for me harked back vividly to the final Sapphire and Steel story when the characters can constantly hear the engine of a car in a sort of repetitive loop somewhere beyond the isolated garage they are trapped in. Other aspects of the direction in this episode were also rather Sapphire and Steel-esque: the beautifully haunting shot of a leafless tree creaking in the breeze of an eerily silent townscape, hinting of the oncoming intervention from the Reapers; the Doctor and Rose re-visiting the scene of the crash and watching themselves watching it. I was worried about this episode, chiefly because it was going to place much more emphasis on Rose and her family background. However, this time, and despite Jackie's still rather grating presence in the episode, the scenario was handled intelligently, subtly and with much emotional substance which was genuinely convincing and moving. It was so much the actual protagonists who really mattered here: it was the very profound and compelling scenario of enacting one's emotional wishes in bringing a loved one back to life on having the extraordinary opportunity of being able to travel back in time and do so; more particularly in this case, of a girl who had never even met her father seizing this one-off chance to get to know him by disobeying the first rule of time travel. This sort of subject should have come up much more often in the old series but very rarely, if ever, did (to my memory). So here we have for perhaps the first substantial time, an emotionally charged look at the possibilities of time travel in a series which traditionally, and puzzlingly, mostly eschewed this kind of very human realism regarding time travel's possibilities (bar The Curse of Fenric and Ace's inadvertantly saving the life of her baby mother and thus ensuring her own future). In this sense, as with Dalek's newly emotional and intellectual analysis of the nature of a humanised Kaled mutant inside the Dalek's casing, Father's Day too has improved on the original series (these are, however, the only senses in which New Who has dones so).Father's Day's biggest debt however is to the companion-based emotional time journeys of Season 26, in which a similarly Sapphire-and-Steel-esque, metaphysically mysterious and Jehovah-style manipulative Doctor takes his troubled young companion on a series of time travelling behavioural therapy sessions, making her confront her inner fears and unresolved emotional issues. The Ninth, as with the Seventh Doctor, have questionable motives in doing this, and as in The Long Game when the Doctor deliberately dangled the fruits of future knowledge before Adam as if to will him to fall into temptation, only to berate him afterwards, in Father's Day he once again puts his companion, this time the more reliable Rose, in a position of almost unbearable temptation when she has the chance to save her dead father's life. He must know she is going to do this. Is there some sort of plan of his in facilitating such situations for his companions? Is he trying to teach them lessons? So, Ghost Light comes to mind a little in the Doctor taking Ace back to face her deepest fears relating to a haunted house she once firebombed, but the most obvious comparison is Ace's creation of her own future in Curse of Fenric; particularly, that story's emotionally cathartic climax has much in common with the plot direction of Father's Day, which too is a catharsis for Rose. There is also something of Survival in Father's Day, more superficially but in the late 80's suburban location used in both stories and also in the brilliant shots in both of playgrounds being spied on by the eyes of unseen aliens (re the cats in suburban Perrivale in Survival and the Reapers in another sunny London suburb in 1987). So Cornell, perhaps deliberately, has managed to produce a story which quite nicely follows on in genre to the final story of the old cannon which, looking back at the time, seemed strikingly down-to-earth and mundane in its suburban scenario as does Father's Day. The trend for more human-based, emotionally driven suburban-set Doctor Who was starting to creep in at Season 26's end, so in that there is little new, except New Who's propensity to concentrate in detail on the companion's contemporary home life intermittently, and - with exception to Cornell's very moving and well-realised visit in this episode - rather gratingly in the other episodes so far.The Reapers are fairly impressive and the shots of them galumphing past the stained glass windows were impressively handled, with appropriately ominous shadows falling in on the church inside. When they finally cavort around the church you could feel their size and weight as they swooped in between the cloisters. However, I do take on board the Radio Times preview of the episode which praised it but said it could have been equally as good without the monsters in it. I agree, and think the cleansers of the time disturbance could have been realised far more subtly, not actually fully manifest, and perhaps just suggested as shadows as was often done in Sapphire and Steel.The whole episode would have fallen down with a bad or inappropriate actor playing Rose's father; fortunately we had a stirring performance from this actor in the part, who played it convincingly and showed genuine power when confronting the truth of the situation; as did Billie Piper, this being a best performance yet without a doubt.Most importantly, as previously mentioned, this was the most satisfyingly Doctorish performance from Christopher Eccleston to date.My only criticisms of this episode are: the first ten minutes or so in which there were more inappropriate allusions to a possible romance between the Doctor and Rose via the father's assumptions; the Doctor storming off like a boyfriend in a huff on Rose saying 'just because you're not the most important man in my life for a change'. I was also slightly disturbed by the Doctor saying his 'family are all dead': it was always implied before in the old series that the Doctor's family were long gone: notably a reference to this by Troughton, with appropriate wisftulness and gravitas, in the night scene in Tomb of the Cybermen (one of the greatest scenes ever in which he whispers to Victoria about how only they can do what they do regarding time travel) and again much later in Curse of Fenric when McCoy mumbles 'I don't know' on being asked by Ace's grandmother whether he knew anything about his family's whereabouts re the war. Add to that Susan, the Doctor's granddaughter at the very beginning of the series, and frequent hint at the end of Planet of Fire that the Master was actually the Doctor's brother ('how could you do this to your own...?') - however, the Ninth could mean the term 'family' as referring to his race.Otherwise, no other criticisms. Overall a very good episode, joint-second (with Unquiet Dead) to Dalek, and a classic of its kind and in the subtler and more profound genre of Sapphire and Steel's existential take on time travel. Well done Mr Cornell. 8/10.If only New Who could keep up this standard of emotional intelligence and genuine mystery regarding the main character and the nature of time travel, it could evolve into a genuinely compelling reworking of the old series which could stand on its own in the future. We need more episodes of this type, more dissections of time travel and its possibilities, more gravitas and alienness from the Doctor - Gatiss, Shearman and Cornell have set the new standards. If the show keeps up these sorts of scripts it will survive and prosper. If, however, it stays with inordinately frequent and far inferior contributions from its producer RTD, then I fear the truly excellent episodes will not be sufficient in number to ensure the programme's longevity and critical credibility. They must keep up the standards of Father's Day, Dalek and Unquiet Dead. Fortunately the next two episodes look as if they are going to do just that.




FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television

Father's Day

Sunday, 15 May 2005 - Reviewed by Paul Berry

For the early part of the nineties, the only real source of new Doctor Who was Virgin’s New Adventures, a series of books which although aimed at Doctor Who fans took the wise step of moving the series on in style and tone, or in its own words doing stories that were too broad and deep for the small screen. The New Adventures were for the most part a solid run of hugely engrossing stories, occasionally pretentious, occasionally a little too subversive and every so often a bit too unlike televised Doctor Who, but always at the heart of it were a core group of characters that truly lived and breathed on the printed page. I have not followed much of the subsequent Doctor Who expanded universe, but have found a lot of Big Finish and BBC’s stuff has fallen way short of the standard Virgin set.

Whenever there were rumblings of a return of Doctor Who I always thought that taking a leaf out of Virgin’s book wouldn’t be too bad a thing. The tv movie was poles apart from this approach as has been much of this series so far, but finally with Father’s Day Doctor Who grew up a little and finally put on screen what Virgin did for a select audience all those years ago.

Father’s Day was a very rare thing, a Doctor Who story where flaws were very few and far between, which itself is a remarkable thing in a season where the word flawed comes to mind more times than it should. In short Father’s Day was perhaps the most perfect Doctor Who story ever put on screen, possibly not the best, but definitely the most perfect.

Performances, writing, music, direction, effects, photography, all were top notch.

>From the word go, the story took you in its grip and didn’t let go, doing that thing that only Doctor Who can, putting the mundane and the fantastic together and making it seem totally believable.

I am sure this sort of story has been done somewhere before, in fact the whole time paradox thing is one of the biggest sci fi gimmicks going, but Paul Cornell’s script was so well written and inventive that the whole thing felt totally original, afterall I don’t think anybody else has written a story about a wedding being jinxed by time travelling dragons. The eighties feel was well captured without ever being overdone.

In fact the whole script played on one of the things anyone who ever fantasised about time travel must have thought about, as fascinating as a trip back into the distant past would be, who wouldn’t be more tempted to travel back into their own lifetime, to revisit old memories or perhaps even right a wrong.

Much as I am sure we would all discover, Rose’s past is not as rosetinted as she thinks, and the November day in 1987 much like any other day to anyone who is living it is fairly normal and mundane. Her father also turns out to be less than the saintly figure she had hoped he would be, perfectly set out in the scene where Rose lies to her father about what they used to do together and he replys ‘that isn’t me’. Pete Tyler’s slow realisation that he is a doomed man was as good a piece of drama as anything that BBC1 is likely to put out this year.

I had initially been dubious about the inclusion of monsters in this story, thinking that for once the series could have attempted a bog standard down to earth drama about Rose and her father, but the Reapers were a master stroke. They are by far the best monster for many a year, and crap all over this seasons array of Moxx’s, walking corpses and Slitheen’s from a great height. The eerie shots of the reapers circling the church provided a true iconic Doctor Who moment, to easily rival Daleks on Westminster bridge, Cybermen coming out of tombs, Sea Devils rising from the sea etc. Obviously use of the creatures is limited to a certain degree by them having no dialogue, but I for one would like to see more, perhaps a future story could explore their origins and their exact nature.

Once again the star of the show was Billie Piper, and although she has been more or less faultless throughout the whole season, here she rose (no pun intended) to a new level. She has an astonishing range and makes all her scenes totally convincing and never gives less than 100%. Although nostalgia always plays a part in Doctor Who appreciation, I think it wont be long before she takes her place as number one Doctor Who assistant. Sadly I wish I could say the same about Christopher Eccleston. The more this season goes on the more I come to the conclusion that the guy has been miscast. I initially liked his Doctor and felt it would grow on me over time, but after a few episodes it has settled down into a rather mundane portrayal which only very occasionally feels anything like the Doctor as we know him. Eccleston is a great actor, probably one of Britain’s biggest talents and I was initially very impressed at the coup of his casting. But rather ironically given that everyone thought Billie Piper was going to be terrible, Eccleston has created in my eyes possibly the least memorable Doctor ever put on screen. The combination of the leather jacket, the northern accent, in fact the whole package has had the effect of turning an iconic fantasy creation into the sort of working class character you’d expect to see on a picket line or a building site. To be fair he has chemistry with Billie Piper and his acting in this episode was for the large part faultless, but this season still often feels like a series missing its central character.

Despite this, the episode had some great Doctor moments particularly the line about ‘ how he would try and save the couple’, which reminded us of the Doctors creed that every individual is important no matter how mundane their existence may seem.

Shaun Dingwall as Pete turned in a hugely impressive performance with a down to earth, believable character which never veered into cariacture as Camille Coduri’s Jackie has often done. Indeed the scenes between Rose and her Dad probably showcased some of the finest acting ever in Doctor Who. Pete’s inevitable sacrifice, turning a flawed everyman into the hero, was again one of the series most poignant moments and proved that much like the destruction of the Earth in episode 2, that Doctor Who can do emotion without sinking into overt sentimentality.

Joe Ahearne has been the only stand out director on this season of Doctor Who so far and much like his Dalek episode, brings a pace and atmosphere to this story which is not too far from feature film standard. The whole episode exuded an ominous feeling of impending doom, without resorting to cheap gimmicks like thunderstorms or lightning. I am particularly glad that he is returning at the end of the series as he brings that extra quality, which the glossy by the numbers direction of the earlier episodes particularly those of Keith Boak lacked. And special praise must also go to Murray Gold whose music has got significantly better as this series has gone on. The music to the early episodes was very patchy, but the last few have got better and better, and the score to Father’s day was nigh on perfect, sinister and moving all at the same time, just keep it up Murray.

And so we get to the inevitable flaws and there is only one major thing that comes to mind. What exactly happened at the end and why? Why did the Tardis suddenly return to normal? Why was the Doctor returned to life after Pete’s sacrifice, it wasn’t like time reversed or anything. What has happened to time at the end of the story, obviously time must have been altered, so Jackie will now no longer experience the events of Rose or Aliens of London in the same way, so whichever way you look at itI there’s still a paradox . While some of this may very well be addressed later in the season, I still feel a more thorough explanation could have been forthcoming.

But gripes aside this story was head and shoulders above anything else in this season even Dalek, and was probably the most emotionally involving since Caves of Androzani. Indeed it gets my vote as the series first 21st century classic. After a shaky start to the season, I feel with Dalek this new Doctor Who has hit its stride and is now blooming into something very promising and deserving of all the hype and promises.

The other observation I cant help but make is that another standout episode is once again not written by Russell T Davies. Perhaps he should come down from his self congratulating on Doctor Who Confidential and in the pages of DWM, and start taking stock of his own scripts, because although he picked Billie Piper and has made some strong artistic decisions, his scripts at their best have been rather run of the mill (Rose, The Long game), at their worst utter tripe (AOL, WW3 and parts of EOTW). With only three more of his own episodes to go, the works of Gatiss, Shearman and Cornell should give some food for thought.

That final shot of the Doctor and Rose hand in hand making their lonely walk back to the Tardis ended this story perfectly. For many years Doctor Who was has been written of as cheap bit of outdated tat by critics, Father’s Day proved that Doctor Who in 2005 can still be just as relevant and fresh in 2005 as it was over 40 years ago.





FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television

Father's Day

Sunday, 15 May 2005 - Reviewed by Jack Green

What can I say! Quite possibly my favourite episode of the series so far. Its quite odd really, as I came in, having video taped the episode, when my sister tells me that it was really crap. I can see where she may have been disappointed - not a lot of explosions or conventional evil genius'. No this was RAW EMOTION!

I don't care if this is "Doctor Who" or not, this was amazing emotional television. Everything was explained as well - the fact that these creatures were able to exist was due to the destruction of Gallifrey - if the timelords were still alive they could have stopped it.

There are only one or two bad points for me really - one is the predictability that Pete Tyler had to sacrifice himself - although this may be a good point as we come closer to the inevitability of it... hmmm yes thats a good point. Right, there is only one bad point - and thats how poor the empty tardis was - I'd have preferred it if there was an infinite space within it - but with nothing there. Am I babbling?

I think Jacqui was acted superbly, as was Pete - but the real star of the show was Billie Piper as Rose - I am SO impressed by her this series its unreal - I was hesitant of her being the companion - now I know it was an inspired move!

Its very odd how the man responsible for the new series - good ol Russell T, is being overtaken by people like Shearman, Gatis, and Cornell in terms of the best writers. Just an observation, would you agree?





FILTER: - Series 1/27 - Ninth Doctor - Television