The Girl in the Fireplace
Ahh, the Doctor in love. How sweet. Can't complain as its been done before (William Hartnell: The Aztecs). I did think it was a bit rushed though. Was it love or just a sudden infatuation? Who cares?
I really liked this episode when I watched it at 7pm last night. When I watched it again this morning I felt a little... disappointed. For the first time this season, actually. All the other episodes have had their faults but have generally been satisfying slices of New Doctor Who. The Girl in the Fireplace had a lot of great elements but just didn't quite achieve the depth it seemed to be trying to reach. Don't get me wrong, great acting, direction, costumes, effects (apart from the horse/mirror thing), scary robots etc etc. But it all felt a little inconsequential.
The relationship between the Doctor and Madame De Pompadour was a nice idea, him becoming her guardian (at least in her eyes) throughout her life. But the idea that, having not seen him since she was 7 years old, her 23 year old self would snog him seems a little unlikely. An extra fifteen minutes might have allowed us to have seen him reappear more often in her life, which would have made her reaction more plausible.
The robots were excellent. The masks were truly terrifying. The threat was exciting. But they didn't actually do anything. Which made them a rather redundant threat. The whole "we don't have the parts" idea was beautifully gruesome, particularly when connected with Rose and Mickey's earlier comments about someone cooking and Sunday roasts - but it was glossed over too quickly (musn't scare the kiddies too much). The modern Doctor Who feels a little castrated to me. The Doctor Who I watched in the Seventies and Eighties wasn't afraid to get down and dirty every now and then but 30 years on and we can't see blood, we can't see a human kill another human, we can't do black magic, religion or witchcraft either (seriously, they can't - BBC guidelines) which pretty much rules out them ever repeating old Doctor Who doesn't it?
And what happened with Rose and Mickey? Sidelined for the entire episode, Mickey's first trip in the TARDIS was bugger all of an event for him really. Rose seems to have forgotten her grumpy attitude at the end of School Reunion when the Doctor invited him to stay and equally seems quite unconcerned about the Doctor's romantic interest in MDP despite having practically decimated Sarah Jane a week ago for daring to breathe the Doctor's name.
I understand what they were trying to do, and Tennant and Myles worked beautifully together, the scene where he comes back to find her coffin being taken away was particularly touching. But all the "lonely angel" stuff was beginning to grate by the end and I can't believe that the Doctor would unthinkingly leave Rose and Mickey stranded on the spaceship, knowing they can't operate the TARDIS. When he realised he was stuck in France for 3000 years, he didn't mention them once. That was sloppy writing (or editing?).
I have tried very hard not to mention how spectacularly good The Empty Child was last year and how it was my favourite story from Eccleston's run because I wanted to let The Girl in the Fireplace stand on its own merits. Unfortunately this was an episode that truly qualifies as style over substance and although it was an enjoyable 45 minutes and I will definitely watch it again - it just won't be very often. 3/5
Things I Loved: The droid under the bed, "we have no parts", David Tennant (still amazing), Noel Clarke, Sophia Myles, the design, the direction, the dialogue, the revolving fireplace, the central idea, the name of the ship (beautifully done), the Doctor's last scene in the TARDIS...
Things I Didn't Love: the inconsequential nature of it all, being left with a feeling of "so what?"
 
                        Subscribe to News
 Subscribe to News Follow us on Twitter
 Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook
 Like us on Facebook Contact Us
 Contact Us