Re-watching The Shakespeare Code, for one thing I was pleased to find I enjoyed it as much as last time, but more importantly I'd utterly missed the bit where the Bedlam guy offers to whip the inmates for the Doctor's amusement, which is an excellent reason for the Doc to dislike him. And also, the Doctor himself looked like he was wearing his old brown suit instead of the blue one he ended Smith and Jones in. Now, I could be wrong, but if not, isn't that a continuity error?
As for Gridlock itself, it fell into the same pre-credits trap as The Shakespeare Code last week ? that is, they were irrelevant and not particularly special, leading me to think that they should ease up on the pre-credits openers a bit, only using the device for scripts that justify it, such as Father's Day and both of Stephen Moffat's scripts. Oddly enough, the return to the 'opening credits, story' type was a significant factor in my great enjoyment of Smith and Jones! Russell T also returns to his stock hawking-your-wares sequences; it was annoying in The Long Game and it wasn't great here. David Tennant wheels out his OTT outrage again, for a short time, as well, but more than makes up for it later on with a cute and tender scene featuring kittens! Now I defy all but the most hard-hearted people not to go all mushy for that bit; I know I did. And am I mistaken, or were those kittens starting to talk?
The setting of Gridlock is a standard case of satire turned up to eleven. It's been argued that the cardinal rule of satire (a major interest of Russell Davies, of course) is simply to take a prominent feature of your own day, and exaggerate it ? this Russell does, and then some, which is how we come to have the first story in Doctor Who history to be set in a traffic jam! There's a fair bit of anti-drug stuff, too, which isn't anything like as bad as it might've been. As settings go, the grime and horror stand in stark contrast to the chilly beauty of the Moon and the warm yellows of Elizabethan London, giving the season a welcome feeling of variety, and it was certainly horrific, though I need to mull it over a bit more before I decide whether or not it made sense (within itself, as a piece of drama, that is).
The whole episode, needless to say, was an excuse for the Face of Boe to tell his big secret, which I'm sure we all saw coming since, ooh, New Earth? The Face has become a big hit ? he seems, from the brief appearances he's clocked up in the show, to be fundamentally a really nice guy (Face), so his death is moving. The Doctor's stubborn insistence on discounting what he says as he breathes his last is pretty odd, but fits with this incarnation's dismaying hostility to anything he doesn't understand, trust, or want to acknowledge. But it was good to see him pull off the same trick as he did last time he visited New Earth, saving tens of thousands, possibly millions, of people from a fate worse than death in one amazing stroke (with the Face's help).
The episode's twin highlights, however, topped and tailed the episode, with some lovely stuff about Gallifrey ? the description of its silver leaves, burnt orange sky et al is a happy mix of the 60s TV stories, the comics and the novels. The final scene of the episode was especially good, with David Tennant playing it? not exactly subtly, I suppose, but movingly. I was never happy with the off-handed way Russell got rid of the planet of the Time Lords, seeing it as a cheap and thoughtless way of darkening the role; rather than any actual targeted characterisation like that seen in the Seventh Doctor era, a mere throwaway line in The End of the World set the bar for what was to come (and set it very low, IMO), and provided pretty much the sum total of both the Ninth and Tenth Doctor's characterisation, although Gallifrey has taken a back seat in DT's Doctor's tormented mind since Rose's disappearing act.
And flipping heck, the Macra?! I mean to say! Oh, I'm not complaining; I'm just surprised. What on earth was the point of that?? They don't even do anything (mind you, neither does Martha in this one). I was delighted to see them, personally, though in a sadly reduced state. The restraint from the team in electing not to show them in the trailer last week was admirable, as it would have totally ruined a surprise for which there was actually no pay-off after the initial shock. Russell T Davies baffles me sometimes. Because it's not like you can really use the Macra in a script, obviously, so I guess it's just some fan service he cooked up in a fit of generosity. The Macra? Why?
Martha continues to suffer at the Doctor's unwitting hands, although at the end her sit-down protest demanding his attention and a serious talk pays off, and she ends up getting his back-story (in recycled dialogue, but she's not to know!) But even she seems to have realised what I've been saying is true about semi-conscious behaviour patterns being the reason that he picked her up in the first place, and early in the episode you can see the light bulb go on over her head as it becomes clear that he's on some level trying to re-create what he had with Rose. This subplot would be really unpleasant if it wasn't for the fact that the Doctor actually does seem to be getting to like Martha and to enjoy her company; as it is, it's quite a poignant storyline, and the Doctor-Martha relationship is more engaging than the Doctor-Rose love-in ever was. Just a shame that the love-in still isn't over, even in the dratted girl's absence!
Series 3, I am happy to say, is continuing to perform beyond expectations. It's got to the point where seeing Doctor Who on a Saturday evening has really cheered me up, rather than given me a sick feeling like it frequently used to, post-2005 ? the episodes are mostly enjoyable at the moment and there is nothing really to complain about (nothing new, anyway), whereas throughout Series 1 & 2 there invariably was. Rock on, Doctor. And please, please, please, don't let the space pigs spoil everything. Oh God, I can see it now?